First off, I’ve released a new game! It’s called “The Play”, and it’s a text-based interactive story about a theatre director trying to make sure a dress rehearsal doesn’t go horribly wrong. Except, well, there’s a bit more to it than that. Anyway, go play it if you haven’t already. It’s not very long to get through, and it even plays well with mobile devices! 
Anyway, below the jump are some of my assorted spoileriffic thoughts on the game. Hello, sweetie!
On the origin of the story, and dealing with the subject of sexual harassment
I’ll admit, I wasn’t intentionally setting out to write a story about sexual harassment in the beginning; what I did start out with was a reimagining of a story I was working on in 2008ish with my friend Lee, which was basically a farce about a bunch of people rehearsing for a play, heavily influenced by the film “Noises Off”. That original project ultimately never got finished, but the basic idea still remained stuck in my head, and when I discovered the Undum framework and thought it to be an ideal format for telling a story in the making, I decided to bring that old concept back.
Of course, when writing the new script, all sorts of questions came to my mind. Who is Ainsley, anyway, and what’s at stake? I knew the play was set to be a disaster and that Ainsley’s once-prolific career was hanging by its last thread, but why? And then it dawned on me: in a previous production, Ainsley was confronted head-on with a case of sexual harassment perpetrated by a popular, likeable, and talented actor, and made the difficult decision to fire him from the show — a decision that subsequently turned the final result into a horrible flop and rendered Ainsley unpopular with the greater theatre community. 
So, the more I wrote, the more the story itself unravelled to be about sexism and privilege, while at the same time retaining its roots as a silly comedy that was just plain fun to write — and hopefully read, as well. As is the challenge with everything I write these days that touches on some kind of social issue, I didn’t want to lose people by being too preachy and on-the-nose, particularly as I myself don’t really like reading preachy and on-the-nose. Some reviews I read suggested I went in the opposite direction towards over-subtlety, particularly since this is a branching narrative and many aspects of the harassment backstory can be skipped or overlooked completely. Others found their first playthroughs about as blatant as it would have been if the game were just a big neon sign with “FEMINISM” written on it. It’s a tough balance I’m still learning to get the hang of.
On the matter of Ainsley’s gender
One thing I definitely did want to do in this story was challenge myself to dream up a gender-neutral protagonist. And not just any old AFGNCAAP player insertion character either, but a real person, with thoughts and feelings and an actual, well, personality. Just not with a specified gender.  The pure text medium gave me the advantage of being able to heavily rely on the word “you” and leave out gendered physical cues, and after carefully thinking of gender-neutral names that fit the personality I had in my head, I came up with “Ainsley”.
What I found curious was that, given what I read from those who played the game, most (at first) assumed a character of the same gender as they were, finding elements in the text to support their reading. There was a part in which Ainsley is mentioned to have worn a tight dress at a college party, which led several people to see Ainsley as more likely to be female — but could it have been indicative of a penchant for crossdressing? This is theatre we’re talking about. And there’s definitely some gendered hostility and resentment from Brock, but is it because Ainsley’s a woman, or a so-called “gender traitor” as a man, or transgendered and therefore not a “real” woman/man, or visibly indistinguishable and worthy of scorn for that alone? None of these readings are any more correct than others, as far as I’m concerned. Still, I hope it got people thinking.
As for me, when I picture Ainsley, I think of a cross between Michael Caine and my high school drama teacher, Ms. Hogan. But that’s by no means canon.
On the play within “The Play”, and also the game… er, play
“Nothing’s Fair in Art, Love, or War”, the short one-act scene about a talking statue, her artist, and a reluctant gladiator, was something I knocked out specifically as a) a rather trite, mediocre play Ainsley was stuck with having to direct, sort of as punishment for how the harassment situation mentioned above was handled, that b) also lent itself to multiple endings of varying levels of silliness. So, I threw together a mishmash of the Pygmalion & Galatea myth  reimagined as a marital argument, with a little bit of the first scene in George Bernard Shaw’s “Arms and the Man” thrown in. The “original” script barely gives the statue anything to do except complain and eventually resign herself to her unsatisfying life; subsequent improvisations suggested by her actress  give her quite a bit more agency.
I wasn’t particularly intending the performance of this piece to be a realistic depiction of a dress rehearsal so much as a symbolic commentary on collaboration and interpersonal conflict, particularly when Serious Issues are at stake. Usually, the key to a successful performance is to practice the same thing over and over again until it’s sufficiently polished, which would lead to gameplay that feels more like an RPG grinding mechanic.  But then, since that’s not really the kind of gameplay I’m personally interested in tackling, I have instead a game mechanic that encourages you as a director to collaborate with your actors and allow them to improvise alternate takes on the story. In most productions, this would be a recipe for absolute disaster, but in this particular play, which is already established as hackneyed and tired and predestined for disaster anyway, trying all sorts of silly things to subvert the audience’s expectations might just make it work. You’ll still end up with a mess, but at least this time around, it’ll be more fun to watch.
Reviews and such
If you’re interested in reading what some of the competition judges thought of “The Play”, you can check out some reviews here. I especially recommend Emily Short’s analysis, which literally made me exclaim “YES! Someone gets it!” when I first read it. Also, someone did lolcat reviews this year, which amused me.
“The Play” also managed to get itself mentioned in a few mainstreamish publications, such as indiegames.com, Rock Paper Shotgun, PC Gamer, and even The Guardian. I’m pretty thrilled that I managed to write something that not only interests the interactive fiction crowd, but also appeals to a broader range of gamers as well.
EDIT: And now Lee, who has more insider info on “The Play” than anyone else, has posted his kind and flattering impressions of the game.
For some extra fun
In a previous post, I included a small teaser image of the mind map I made to keep track of all the different branches possible in “The Play”. The full-sized version can now be viewed here — take a look and see if you can find some interesting outcomes you may have previously missed!