<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Embarrassment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/</link>
	<description>videogame development from the margins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Management</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7358</link>
		<dc:creator>The Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7358</guid>
		<description>Personally, one of my oft-repeated adages, &quot;length doesn&#039;t matter; it&#039;s what you do with it that counts&quot;, definitely applies here. You can be concise and insightful, or lengthy and boring, or any combination of the above.

That said, I haven&#039;t really had the time or motivation to read Stephen Fry&#039;s blog, not only because it&#039;s long, but also combined with him not talking about a specific topic I&#039;m interested in. My desire to actually spend a good chunk of time reading something is directly proportional to how interesting and relevant I find the subject at first glance. Sometimes, it&#039;s better to be short and to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, one of my oft-repeated adages, &#8220;length doesn&#8217;t matter; it&#8217;s what you do with it that counts&#8221;, definitely applies here. You can be concise and insightful, or lengthy and boring, or any combination of the above.</p>
<p>That said, I haven&#8217;t really had the time or motivation to read Stephen Fry&#8217;s blog, not only because it&#8217;s long, but also combined with him not talking about a specific topic I&#8217;m interested in. My desire to actually spend a good chunk of time reading something is directly proportional to how interesting and relevant I find the subject at first glance. Sometimes, it&#8217;s better to be short and to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rikard</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7357</link>
		<dc:creator>Rikard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7357</guid>
		<description>Fry&#039;s blog does indeed seem interesting. It&#039;s only got two entries so far, so it may be a bit early to tell, but it&#039;s clear that he knows how to write - and think. That it&#039;s &quot;a little long as blogs go&quot; I think is a good thing. The blog essays, or blessays as he horribly prefers to call them (his words) are - so far - well thought through. 

It&#039;s a better use of my time to spend half-an-hour reading a well written blessay than five minutes with something half as good. I&#039;m adding the feed to my small collection (it&#039;ll be feed number four). Then we&#039;ll see how long it stays there.

Regarding the actual topic of the blog, well, you won&#039;t find anyone disagreeing on that here. After all, this is a blog, and we are its readers. If blogging is lame, reading blogs must be even more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fry&#8217;s blog does indeed seem interesting. It&#8217;s only got two entries so far, so it may be a bit early to tell, but it&#8217;s clear that he knows how to write &#8211; and think. That it&#8217;s &#8220;a little long as blogs go&#8221; I think is a good thing. The blog essays, or blessays as he horribly prefers to call them (his words) are &#8211; so far &#8211; well thought through. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a better use of my time to spend half-an-hour reading a well written blessay than five minutes with something half as good. I&#8217;m adding the feed to my small collection (it&#8217;ll be feed number four). Then we&#8217;ll see how long it stays there.</p>
<p>Regarding the actual topic of the blog, well, you won&#8217;t find anyone disagreeing on that here. After all, this is a blog, and we are its readers. If blogging is lame, reading blogs must be even more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Management</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7343</link>
		<dc:creator>The Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7343</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s okay. We can be uncool together, like emo kids!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s okay. We can be uncool together, like emo kids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusEditions</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7315</link>
		<dc:creator>MusEditions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7315</guid>
		<description>Deirdra!  You had a cinnamon bun for breakfast?  That&#039;s so awesome, dude!
My favorite book title ever is &quot;What You Think of Me is None of My Business&quot;.  I would extend that to &quot;What you think of my blog is none of my business...&quot;  I blog because it gets all the stuff churning around inside my head out where I can look at it and tweak it, and at times redirect it.  If people enjoy reading it, well, great!  If not, I presume they&#039;ll find entertainment and enlightenment elsewhere.  I didn&#039;t know that blogs are lame, and therefore I must be lame.  Oh well.  I like your blog because you include lots of social commentary along with the great gaming news.  And you are the only blogger I&#039;ve come across that uses footnotes.  I&#039;m deeply sorry that makes you so un-cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deirdra!  You had a cinnamon bun for breakfast?  That&#8217;s so awesome, dude!<br />
My favorite book title ever is &#8220;What You Think of Me is None of My Business&#8221;.  I would extend that to &#8220;What you think of my blog is none of my business&#8230;&#8221;  I blog because it gets all the stuff churning around inside my head out where I can look at it and tweak it, and at times redirect it.  If people enjoy reading it, well, great!  If not, I presume they&#8217;ll find entertainment and enlightenment elsewhere.  I didn&#8217;t know that blogs are lame, and therefore I must be lame.  Oh well.  I like your blog because you include lots of social commentary along with the great gaming news.  And you are the only blogger I&#8217;ve come across that uses footnotes.  I&#8217;m deeply sorry that makes you so un-cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Management</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7304</link>
		<dc:creator>The Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7304</guid>
		<description>You win the conversation, Giligan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You win the conversation, Giligan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giligan</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7303</link>
		<dc:creator>Giligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7303</guid>
		<description>Blogs are only not cool if the writer uses footnotes. That&#039;s a serious sign of un-hipness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are only not cool if the writer uses footnotes. That&#8217;s a serious sign of un-hipness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Management</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7302</link>
		<dc:creator>The Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7302</guid>
		<description>Would you say there&#039;s an objective standard for what makes a blog &quot;good&quot; and what makes one &quot;bad&quot;? If so, I completely disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you say there&#8217;s an objective standard for what makes a blog &#8220;good&#8221; and what makes one &#8220;bad&#8221;? If so, I completely disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/comment-page-1/#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deirdrakiai.com/2007/10/19/blog-embarrassment/#comment-7301</guid>
		<description>There are good blogs and there are bad blogs. Blogs are not themselves evil or lame any more than YouTube is inherently evil or lame. It&#039;s all down to what people do with it. If you don&#039;t like blogs then don&#039;t read them (or write them. that&#039;s just hypocrisy) 

Maybe we chould make it a point to search out good blogs (or just good individual posts) For starters the blog by Stephen Fry the English comedian is fascinating (if a little long as blogs go.

Check it out at http://stephenfry.com/blog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are good blogs and there are bad blogs. Blogs are not themselves evil or lame any more than YouTube is inherently evil or lame. It&#8217;s all down to what people do with it. If you don&#8217;t like blogs then don&#8217;t read them (or write them. that&#8217;s just hypocrisy) </p>
<p>Maybe we chould make it a point to search out good blogs (or just good individual posts) For starters the blog by Stephen Fry the English comedian is fascinating (if a little long as blogs go.</p>
<p>Check it out at <a href="http://stephenfry.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://stephenfry.com/blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

